From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 26 04:57:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AF816A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:57:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D428243D54 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:57:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A551E78C7C for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:57:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A060A170C6; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:56:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:56:00 -0400 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040626045600.GS29450@afflictions.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200406251853.45449.akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org> <20040626051838.A843@pukruppa.net> <20040626044102.GQ29450@afflictions.org> <20040626015344.75cf6c4e@dserver-2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040626015344.75cf6c4e@dserver-2> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT on a i386 X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: X.Org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:57:14 -0000 Thus spake Marcos Hiroshi Umino (japa@mhu.eti.br) [26/06/04 00:55]: : I have a odd explanation that may make some sense to you. : : The reason is simply that the old xfree you had installed was compiled under old libs. : : XOrg was recently on your machine under supposedly new libs. : : That would be a a very possible explanation on linux, perhaps not in bsd. Plausible, and one I proposed to myself. But I rebuilt X a few times (incremental updates in ports tree, playing around with various things) just before I put in xorg -- so both would have been compiled against the same set of libraries. I can't think of a single reason I'd see a difference, but I don't know the detailed differences between the two ports.