From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Aug 31  5:20:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C71D15095
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 05:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id VAA23630;
	Tue, 31 Aug 1999 21:18:18 +0900 (JST)
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: jkh's message of Tue, 31 Aug 1999 02:58:02 MST.
      <506.936093482@localhost> 
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: KAME IPv6 and freebsd 
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 21:18:18 +0900
Message-ID: <23628.936101898@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>Hmmm.  That's a point.  I was thinking primarily of the "segregate the
>crypto" issue, but you're right that this would also put us back to
>the "bad old days" where sys/ was broken across multiple directories.
>Hmph.  I guess common sense wins over ITAR in this case. :)

	Yes, this is very pity...  Hoping to see more open US export policy
	in the near future.

	KAME has "options IPSEC" (framework, authentication and compression)
	and "options IPSEC_ESP" (encryption) separately defined.  Therefore,
	even if you do not have access to South Africa, you can use AH
	and IPComp.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message