Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:14:44 -0700 From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> To: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <1099160083.21798.5.camel@server.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <200410300907.i9U97plE004694@peedub.jennejohn.org> References: <200410300907.i9U97plE004694@peedub.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-ESpI1HXd2EO+Oq3yyKi3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 02:07, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Sean McNeil writes: > > What I am wondering about is why I get ehci in my kernel when I do not > > ask for it: <snip> > The real way to check is by grep'ing /var/run/dmesg.boot which will > contain scads of messages about EHCI if it's in the kernel. OK, thanks. Looks like it isn't really in the kernel. I made a build with adding "device ehci" and I think "pci/ehci" is the actual device, not "ehci/usb". Sorry for the noise. FWIW, using ehci doesn't cause me any additional issues with USB. My umass pen drive behaves the same with/without ehci except it is faster.=20 This makes me think that my previous issues are with the msdos filesystem, not the usb driver. Cheers, Sean --=-ESpI1HXd2EO+Oq3yyKi3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBg9oTyQsGN30uGE4RAoasAJ9oFNVc3RTXL6HmyKy1/49IWSaOcgCg8NB+ 5CJbqtLlJ01B1+53cJ0gzd4= =hag3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ESpI1HXd2EO+Oq3yyKi3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1099160083.21798.5.camel>