Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:20:59 +0100 (MET)
From:      Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
To:        terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Cc:        adam@veda.is, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Windows TCP/IP interoperability?
Message-ID:  <199601190821.JAA02867@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <199601182334.QAA06556@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> Followups on this should be redirected to -questions, unless you
> believe you are having this problem because of -current specific
> changes?
> 
> > During the past 2 weeks (perhaps longer) I seem to have been experiencing
> > diverse interoperability problems between FreeBSD current and Windows(TM),
> > both in client and server roles. Typically it has manifested as the inability
> > to establish a connection in either direction, or connections hanging and
> > timing out after a minimal amount of data transfer. Does anyone know what
> > might be going on here?
> 
> I have seen no generic Windows/BSD TCP/IP interoperability problems
> for WFWG or Windows95.  Perhaps it is related to your client/server
> software... can you describe you environment in more detail?
> 
> I do know that there is a well known problem caused by Microsoft's
> TCP/IP listening to RIP responses (in violation of legal usage of the
> packets) and dropping connections based on this.  That is, if there is
> a flakey network on your wire, it will cause the windows boxes to act
> flakey.  The "fix" for this is to put a gateway box between the
> offending box and the Windows boxes so that they are not on the same
> logical subnet (since this will isolate them from the broadcasts).
> 
> There is also a known problem with Windows NT boxes illegally generating
> RIP packets and causing other hosts to dump.  This is fixed in the
> latest release of NT, or a patch is available through MSN.  Have you
> recently added an NT machine to a previously functional network?


Is this what has been reported a year ago (by Keith B.) as the so called
'sniper bug' ?



> 
> 
> If this doesn't help, try backing off to an older version of FreeBSD;
> if this helps, then you will be able to CVS diff to find the actual
> problem code.
> 
> 					Terry Lambert
> 					terry@lambert.org
> ---
> Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
> or previous employers.
> 

--Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601190821.JAA02867>