Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 16:37:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Karpberg <karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: /usr/dos for doscmd Message-ID: <199708101438.QAA12699@ocean.campus.luth.se> In-Reply-To: <19970810084631.HZ57983@uriah.heep.sax.de> from J Wunsch at "Aug 10, 97 08:46:31 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to J Wunsch: > As Faried Nawaz wrote: > > > Hmmm... You are right... What is a good "semi-standard" place to > > put such things. I don't necessarily think that we should create > > another directory, or should we? > > > What does it try to install? How about somewhere in /usr/libdata? > > I also thought about /usr/libdata (or /usr/libexec -- it seems to be > an executable file, although not a Unix executable). > > The Makefile would currently break `make release', btw., since it > relies on X11 being installed. This should probably be made > automatically dependant on the actual configuration. Negative side > effect: the doscmd that ships with releases won't be able to do X11. It might be nice to have a directory where doscmd can play around, and where you can also place stuff related to it (like maybe default config file?). Wouldn't /compat/dos work? Or /usr/local/lib/dos or something? About relying on X11 being installed... Can't that be made checked at runtime? By using dlopen() instead of normal dependency, or so? /Mikael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708101438.QAA12699>