From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Aug 27 8:45:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DD437B400 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AE643E6A for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:45:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from casd@myrealbox.com) Received: from myrealbox.com casd@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [213.58.35.33] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.11 $ on Novell NetWare; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:45:06 -0600 Message-ID: <3D6B9E78.6060407@myrealbox.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:44:56 +0100 From: Santos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Is this still actual? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm and http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1147/sam0108q/0108q.htm Even with FreeBSD tuned, it only has similar performance comparing to the others untuned OSes, including Windows 2000! I thought FreeBSD was the fastest on x86. They used their MailEngine software but still.. Maybe using a diferent MTA would show other favorably results? So, why people say FreeBSD is the fastest, when benchmarks prove the contrary? What has changed, perfomance-wise since that article (july 2001)? Santos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message