From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Oct  9 03:00:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA21322
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 03:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA21297;
          Thu, 9 Oct 1997 03:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 03:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710091000.DAA21297@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
Cc: 
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Subject: Re: ports/4730: octave-2.0.9 PLIST need modification.
Reply-To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR ports/4730; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To: Yoshio.Mita@isen.fr
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, Yoshio.Mita@isen.fr
Subject: Re: ports/4730: octave-2.0.9 PLIST need modification.
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 02:58:30 -0700 (PDT)

  * Nevertheless, I still don't think this PLIST have been well sorted,
  * All the "include/octave-2.0.9/*" files should come 
  * before "libexec/octave2.0.9/*" files  when we sort them.
  * Possibly this non-clearly sorted PLIST caused the problem;
  * multiple entry of bin/octave.
 
 You are right.  I didn't mean to say "keep the list that way", I just
 noticed that a previously-sorted part became unsorted.  You are most
 welcome to sort the whole thing. :)
 
 Satoshi