Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:53:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c tcp_subr.c tcp_timer.c tcp_var.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0609071451260.225@niwun.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <450067BB.3080501@elischer.org> References: <200609061356.k86DuZ0w016069@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060906091204.B6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906143204.GQ40020@FreeBSD.org> <20060906093553.L6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906150129.GT40020@FreeBSD.org> <20060907000939.J12826@odysseus.silby.com> <450067BB.3080501@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Julian Elischer wrote: > If we are seeing less than stellar TCP performance on a loaded 6.1 machine > will this change possibly fix it (was faster under 4.8).? I guess it depends on what you mean by "TCP performance". Are you making hundreds or thousands of outbound connections per second? If not, I don't think this will matter to you. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.58.0609071451260.225>