From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 10:47:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458333FE for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60D88FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r01AMut6036859; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:22:56 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r01AMtdu036858; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:22:55 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:22:55 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Manfred Antar Subject: Re: loopback interface broken on current Message-ID: <20130101102255.GA25661@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212271705.qBRH5VHU006208@pozo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201212271705.qBRH5VHU006208@pozo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 10:47:29 -0000 Manfred, On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:05:26AM -0800, Manfred Antar wrote: M> For the past few days the loopback interface 127.0.0.1 is broken on current. M> The last good kernel that works for me is r244662: Mon Dec 24 06:43:07 PST 2012 M> Here are some of the errors from current today: Can you please track this down to the specific revision that made the regression? The timeframe is samll, so binary search probably won't take long time. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.