From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 2 1:18:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E437937B406 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 01:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.11.6/8.11.4) id fA29Idn45247; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:18:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:18:39 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: Mike Meyer Cc: Anthony Atkielski , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: Tiny starter configuration for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20011102101839.B45049@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <64293877@toto.iv> <15330.6606.417524.41024@guru.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15330.6606.417524.41024@guru.mired.org>; from mwm@mired.org on Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:58:06PM -0600 X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:58:06PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > Having a minimal security mechanism - which is how Thompson and > Ritchie described the Unix security mechanism - is *not* the same > thing as being insecure. It may make some security policies impossible > or difficult to implement, but that's a different issue. Thanks Mike, that was exactly the point that I was trying to make, but I guess I failed. I'll leave it at that, this discussion has gone on for too long IMHO. --Stijn -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message