Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:56:33 -0800 From: Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> To: marker@uswest.net Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xinetd vs. tcp_wrappers Message-ID: <19990325125633.A11172@wopr.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990325204041.951BF15371@hub.freebsd.org>; from Jeff Marker on Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 02:40:13PM -0600 References: <4.1.19990325145000.00b63100@mason.gmu.edu> <19990325204041.951BF15371@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 02:40:13PM -0600, Jeff Marker wrote: > Xinetd is nice because it can limit the number of instances of a > specific service. Note that FreeBSD's inetd can also do this. Matt -- Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> * Stay close to the Vorlon. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990325125633.A11172>