From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Feb 23 4:18:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from picnic.mat.net (picnic.mat.net [206.246.122.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E885A1112B for ; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 04:18:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chuckr@mat.net) Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost) by picnic.mat.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA17151; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:16:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:16:58 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey To: Andrew Sparrow Cc: smp@freebsd.org, jason@intercom.com Subject: Re: SMP problems In-Reply-To: <199902230619.WAA18621@shell7.ba.best.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Andrew Sparrow wrote: > > > > This uses Intel PPros ? No cheating now ... not for SMP, you know, you > > > can't. > > Really? > > > > > Since when? I've been running SMP on a Micron W6Li dual-CPU 440-FX > socket 8 P6 board (fitted with 2x PPro166/512 o/clocked to 233Mhz) > since last March: OK, so where's the conflict? I said you have to run *Intel* Ppros, your listing shows you *do* run them. They're the only ones that have the correct APIC design for FreeBSD-smp. I was reminding ... you seem to be disagreeing, but I don't see where ?? I didn't say anything about the motherboard ... I personally run a Tyan mobo (same processors as you). Was that your misunderstanding? ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@glue.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 213 Lakeside Drive Apt T-1 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic (FreeBSD-current) (301) 220-2114 | and jaunt (Solaris7). ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message