From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 17:00:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F72916A4D3 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:00:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C873643D41 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:00:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 56355 invoked by uid 1001); 17 Jan 2004 00:01:54 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:01:54 +0100 From: Michal Pasternak To: Matt Olander Message-ID: <20040117000153.GA39482@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Olander , "Devon H. O'Dell" , freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org References: <008001c3dc8a$624914a0$60d0fea9@workstation> <4008807B.5090105@sitetronics.com> <20040116162613.G91963@knight.ixsystems.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040116162613.G91963@knight.ixsystems.net> cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reply to V. Velox & questions about ``evangelism'' X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:00:35 -0000 Matt Olander [Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:26:13PM -0800]: > good question. key points I always touch on are: > > ports collection ... Gentoo Linux ... pkgsrc ... propably some more build systems I haven't heard of. >From Gentoo Linux user's perspective, Portage build system will be better, than FreeBSD Ports, just because s/he will be able to rebuild whole system, not only 3rd-part apps using single interface. Other your points are very important, there aren't many opensource operating systems, which provide such things.