From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 04:25:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A1516A4CE; Tue, 17 May 2005 04:25:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC3C43D94; Tue, 17 May 2005 04:25:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j4H4PBsO003073; Tue, 17 May 2005 00:25:12 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <200410020349.i923nG8v021675@northstar.hetzel.org> <20041002052856.GE17792@nexus.dglawrence.com> <20041002233542.GL714@nexus.dglawrence.com> <421DAD8F.6000704@portaone.com> <4284D038.50805@FreeBSD.org> <4284D4BC.9070705@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 00:25:11 -0400 To: Maxim Sobolev From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) on 128.113.2.2 cc: Paul Saab cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in #! processing - One More Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 04:25:18 -0000 At 12:45 PM -0400 5/13/05, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >Note that I'm not just "running this through buildworld". That's >how all the previous changes were tested, too. I have a whole >battery of tests that I've been slogging through. Scanning through /usr/src, the following scripts *might* have problems with this change we agreed on, depending on how they are used: ./contrib/ipfilter/rules/BASIC.NAT=: #!/sbin/ipnat -f - ./contrib/ipfilter/rules/BASIC_1.FW: #!/sbin/ipf -f - ./contrib/ipfilter/rules/BASIC_2.FW: #!/sbin/ipf -f - ./contrib/ntp/scripts/monitoring/ntptrap: #!/local/bin/perl --*-perl-*- ./sys/conf/makeLINT.sed: #!/usr/bin/sed -E -n -f ./tools/regression/ia64/unaligned/unaligned.t: #!/usr/bin/env perl -w ./tools/tools/backout_commit/backout_commit.rb: #!/usr/bin/env ruby -w I don't think any of these are serious, but it's nice to find them ahead of the change instead of after the fact. I will probably be out of town for Tuesday and part of Wednesday. And I imagine I'll spend part of Thursday "in a galaxy far-far away", even though the first two episodes were incredibly lame. But I do still expect to commit the change sometime later this week, unless someone objects. But since this is change somewhat more disruptive than I initially expected, I doubt I will MFC all of these changes into 5.x-stable. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu