From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jul 12 15:11:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA18190 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 12 Jul 1998 15:11:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from greeves.mfn.org (greeves.mfn.org [204.238.179.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA18182 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 1998 15:11:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sysadmin@mfn.org) Received: from noc.mfn.org (noc.mfn.org [204.238.179.35]) by greeves.mfn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA12966; Sun, 12 Jul 1998 17:10:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from sysadmin@mfn.org) Received: by noc.mfn.org with Microsoft Mail id <01BDADE1.C9CE4FB0@noc.mfn.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 1998 22:09:50 +0100 Message-ID: <01BDADE1.C9CE4FB0@noc.mfn.org> From: NOC-GFX To: Doug White , "'Jerry Blancher'" Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: CPU usage. Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 22:09:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You should benchmark your processors, it may well be that your Cyrix processor has a significantly faster microcode, or possibly a larger internal cache: either of these could conceivably do it.. J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org ---------- From: Jerry Blancher Sent: Sunday, July 12, 1998 8:32 PM To: Doug White Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPU usage. Nope.. no top open.. I tried the exact same code (after being compiled on the machine) on all three machines. And when there are multiple programs like that running, 1% each makes a difference, and that was 1% for my code base, others use 2-3% more cpu. On Sun, 12 Jul 1998, Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 1998, Jerry Blancher wrote: > > > hello, > > I have a question, Let me set up the info: > > > > machine A: FreeBSD 2.2.5 > > Cyrix p200+ > > 128 Meg of EDO > > 4Gig bigfoot HD > > machine B: FreeBSD 2.2.6 > > AMD 233MMX with a extra 6" fan for cooling > > 64 Meg of SDRAM > > 5.2 Gig Ultra-DMA HD > > machine C: FreeBSD 3.0 > > AMD 233MMX with a extra 6" fan for cooling > > 128 Meg of SDRAM > > 5.2 Gig Ultra-DMA HD > > > > Here is the question, I have a program (a MUD) that I ran on all 3 > > machines, all 3 machines show's it using about the same Mem. Machine A the > > cpu usage would drop down to 0% but machine B and C would not go below 1%. > > What was changed between version 2.2.5 and 2.2.6 that would cause this, > > and what could I do to fix it( other then run 2.2.5 on ALL my servers? > > I wouldn't get to excited about 1% CPU usage. Perhaps you left a top > running somewhere? > > Doug White | University of Oregon > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message