From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 25 14:56:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA13986
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 14:56:34 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA13956
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 14:56:25 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au)
Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00387;
	Wed, 26 Nov 1997 09:21:50 +1030 (CST)
Message-Id: <199711252251.JAA00387@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How many loopback interfaces has anybody successfully used? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:02:25 -0800."
             <Pine.NEB.3.95.971125130058.5824b-100000@mail.cdsnet.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 09:21:50 +1030
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Just curious.  Had an idea for something, but it would depend on FreeBSD's
> ability to handle a few thousand or so IP's on loopback aliases.

Definitely no problem.  Just stack 'em up.  8)

mike