From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jun 21 12: 0: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCB714BEC for ; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA98103; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906211900.MAA98103@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf] Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/11796; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav To: Doug Cc: Sheldon Hearn , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@wnm.net Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf] Date: 21 Jun 1999 20:50:03 +0200 Doug writes: > You are really really missing my point here, so I will state it > again. If you have carefully examined the code for *every* case of *every* > internal service, and you have tested it thoroughly, and you are 100% sure > that the man page is in error, change the man page. The confusion arises from the fact that inetd and /etc/services disagree on what the canonical name for the ident service is. Inetd has these canonical names hardcoded in an array of structs, so changing the canonical name in /etc/services does not affect inetd's belief of what the canonical name is. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message