From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct 23 15:00:18 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA00820
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 15:00:18 -0700
Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA00794
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:59:57 -0700
Received: by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.6.10/1.53)
    id WAA08413; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:59:42 +0100
From: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij)
Message-Id: <199510232159.WAA08413@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Subject: clk interrupts > 150/sec???
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:59:41 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 335       
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

How can this be explained:

[~] guido@iaehv> vmstat -i
interrupt      total      rate
clk0 irq0     3884051      156
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
rtc0 irq8     3173264      128
fdc0 irq6           1        0
sc0 irq1         2462        0
ed0 irq5      3667585      147

I always thought clk0 should have a rate of 100/sec.

-Guido