Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:01:20 +1000 From: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ideal Diablo 1.5 binaries platform Message-ID: <443789F0.7070003@roq.com> In-Reply-To: <20060407184232.GB41043@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <4435D900.2080003@roq.com> <20060407184232.GB41043@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lewis wrote: >Hi Michael, > >On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:14:08PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote: > > >>I would like to say its great news to see Certified FreeBSD binaries for >>Java. Congratulations to all those at FreeBSD who made it happen. >> >>On the down side I have also been testing out the new binary Java with >>Tomcat 5.5.12 and have been easily able to crash it. >>Is there a recommend platform version of FreeBSD for using these new >>binaries? >>I tried on 6.0 release and it was worse then using 6-stable, I am still >>going to do more testing with my environment setups. >> >> > >The recommended versions are 5.4 or 6.0, depending on which binary you >grabbed. Those are the platforms the binaries was tested on. > >Can you please post the crash information? > > Yeah I will post some sometime soon, but they do all appear to be thread related. So far I have found that running 6-stable seems to work better and changing the threading libraries around I currently have this in my /etc/libmap.conf for using the older libc_r threading library and I have been benchmarking a Java servlet non stop for around 12 hours now and seems to be fine. I haven't really started testing on libthr yet but the libthr seems to work a lot better then the default pthread as well. [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/] libpthread.so libc_r.so libpthread.so.2 libc_r.so.6 #libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 #libpthread.so libthr.so
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?443789F0.7070003>