From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 18 10:26:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7617A37B423; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10283; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:25:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09476; Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:25:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:25:51 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200009181725.LAA09476@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Soren Schmidt Cc: uwe@ptc.spbu.ru (Valeriy E. Ushakov), stable@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 release on September 25th In-Reply-To: <200009172038.WAA86368@freebsd.dk> References: <20000916174845.B28031@snark.ptc.spbu.ru> <200009172038.WAA86368@freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ Sorry, this one jumped out at me.... ] > > I raised these issue before but got no reply. > > > > What are the reasons that VCD patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~luoqi/ > > is not commited? It's been around for almost two years now and people > > use it successfully. But reapplying the patch after each cvsup is > > kind of PITA. > > Because I dont favour the ioctl interface, its no longer needed... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > If /dev/acd*t* is going to be the answer then can this be stated > > directly, please, to cut the confusion. BTW, as I wrote just few days > > ago, acd*t* support was MFC'ed but relevant changes to MAKEDEV to > > create those devices were not. > > No its not, you simply open /dev/acdNc and set the blocksize to > what you need with the CDRIOCSETBLKSIZE ioctl and reads the blocks ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > woth a normal read from the device.... So, do you like ioctl(), or not? First you say it's not needed, then you say open a device and use ioctl() on it? You can't have it both ways. :) :) :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message