Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:22:24 -0700 From: Bill Campbell <freebsd@celestial.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem that both FreeBSD and OS X can read/write Message-ID: <20070402162224.GA29103@ayn.mi.celestial.com> In-Reply-To: <8e96a0b90704020915t2d3f3206hbcfb98514dff6ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <8e96a0b90704011053h7cbbf52bkf9e45c623d264a38@mail.gmail.com> <4610AEFB.5060909@diomedia.be> <461123FC.8090700@mac.com> <8e96a0b90704020915t2d3f3206hbcfb98514dff6ae@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007, mal content wrote: >On 02/04/07, Peter A. Giessel <pgiessel@mac.com> wrote: >>On 2007/04/01 23:21, bram seems to have typed: >>> If both machines are connected through a network you may also want to >>> take a look at netatalk >> >>or Samba or NFS. For my network, I mostly transfer files between my >>Macs (5 boxes) and FreeBSD (4 boxes) boxes via sftp. It doesn't "mount" >>any drives, but it efficiently and securely transfers files. >> > >Unfortunately, they are only connected via the internet. Transferring >8gb+ files over a DSL-grade connection is rather painful... You may want to look at ``rsync'' as it's very good at doing things like this as it minimzes the network traffic. The Mac version of rsync handles resource forks properly, but this may be an issue going between OS X and FreeBSD depending on the progams that use the data (e.g. the Reunion genealogy software still loos at the resource forks). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 Bagdikian's Observation: Trying to be a first-rate reporter on the average American newspaper is like trying to play Bach's "St. Matthew Passion" on a ukelele.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070402162224.GA29103>