From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  4 04:32:34 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F7A106575F;
	Mon,  4 Jun 2012 04:32:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12A08FC0C;
	Mon,  4 Jun 2012 04:32:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 6E6E856205; Sun,  3 Jun 2012 23:32:33 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:32:33 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org>
Message-ID: <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com>
References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE+w-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org>
	<20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com>
	<201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 04:32:34 -0000

On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
> I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions...
> these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive
> documentation and support in these areas would do more good than pkgng.

IMHO pkgng and optionsng are necessary, but not sufficient, to solve
our current problems.

mcl