From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 20 11:52:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA27647 for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 11:52:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from marble.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp (marble.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp [133.6.57.68]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA27641 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 11:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from marble.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marble.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp (8.7.4+2.6Wbeta6/3.3W9) with ESMTP id EAA01318 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 04:52:36 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199603201952.EAA01318@marble.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: comment for CPU_686 in cputypes.h X-Mailer: Mew beta version 0.96 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 04:52:33 +0900 From: KATO Takenori Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In /sys/i386/include/cputypes.h, comment for CPU_586 is: /* P.....m (I hate lawyers; It's TM) */ but that for CPU_686 is: /* Pentium Pro */ It is not consistent with the comment for CPU_586. Is using TM in source code illegal? I hope the answer, NO. ---- KATO Takenori Dept. Earth Planet. Sci., Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, 464-01, Japan Voice: +81-52-789-2529 Fax: +81-52-789-3033