Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:34:04 +0100
From:      Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>
To:        kpneal@pobox.com
Cc:        Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: top, fixed buffer length in utils.c
Message-ID:  <54D0177C.7070407@sorbs.net>
In-Reply-To: <54D01598.5050400@sorbs.net>
References:  <20150201175159.7fa88d16@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150201195722.68845794@akips.com> <20150201211125.2fb21c39@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150202023709.GA28422@neutralgood.org> <20150202143153.51638086@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150202212237.GA26193@neutralgood.org> <54D01598.5050400@sorbs.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> kpneal@pobox.com wrote:
>   
>> At this point in history the odds of a general purpose computing platform
>> with ints > 32 bits having any success in the market is roughly the same
>> as the chance a metor will stike your house tonight. 
>>     
> 1 in 4,000,000,000,000 (approx) then...? :P
>
>   
Sorry for the second email, I forgot to add: You'll never need more than
640k of RAM... ;-) (and yes I know that's not the actual quote)

-- 
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54D0177C.7070407>