Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 20:32:56 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r520942 - head/multimedia/libva-utils Message-ID: <bee805e0-bf84-048b-807e-c3257ffaee0a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201912261729.xBQHT2Bk076713@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201912261729.xBQHT2Bk076713@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26/12/19 18:29, Jan Beich wrote: > Author: jbeich > Date: Thu Dec 26 17:29:02 2019 > New Revision: 520942 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/520942 > > Log: > multimedia/libva-utils: update to 2.6.0 > > Changes: https://github.com/intel/libva-utils/releases/tag/2.6.0 > > Modified: > head/multimedia/libva-utils/Makefile (contents, props changed) > head/multimedia/libva-utils/distinfo (contents, props changed) > head/multimedia/libva-utils/pkg-plist (contents, props changed) I was working on this update and going to commit it shortly. Why did you commit this without even a notice to the maintainer (me)? While I have no hard feelings about this and would have simply cleared you right away, I think the byrules should be respected. I don't think we want everyone committing to ports without contacting maintainers. If it was just a lapse and you did not notice I was the maintainer I can understand, and BTW if you want to take over this port, I would have no objection. -- Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bee805e0-bf84-048b-807e-c3257ffaee0a>