Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 07:03:49 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: spam@distance.net (RPD) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is NATD / IPFW broke? Message-ID: <199809200503.HAA29704@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <36042DFB.ACB8B0C8@distance.net> from "RPD" at Sep 19, 98 06:19:20 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Stable, > > Something is defiantly broke with the latest source regarding NATD and i am going to look at the problem this morning. > IPFW, I took my old source from Aug 18, 98 and rebuilt my system. NATD / > IPFW work fine. I did not have a chance to try any other cards, I just > have the Intel 10/100 Etherexpress NIC, I doubt there is a problem with > fxp driver though because everything else works fine. If someone has the i ass > balls to cvsup to the latest source and is running natd please let me > know if you have better successes. netstat -i shows the packets are > coming in but NATD in verbose mode is not showing the traffic. have you checked that the "ipfw show" command shows the counters for the natd rule increasing ? > 3. rm -rf /usr/src; installed old source from Aug 18; make world; make > install; recompiled and installed the kernel, natd is working; I am not sure, have you tried the following on today's sources: > > * back out the mods to if_fxp.c and see if things start working (those > > changes should only affect bridging) the above is the only test i cannot do myself. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809200503.HAA29704>