Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:39:21 -0800
From:      Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: spliting kernel ipfw source ? (also involves sctp)
Message-ID:  <49AAC849.9060105@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090301153010.GA58942@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References:  <20090301153010.GA58942@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> I am planning to split netinet/ip_fw2.c in a number of smaller files
> to make it more manageable, and while i do this I would also like
> to move the files related to ipfw2 (namely ip_fw*c) to a better place.
> Any objection to moving them to sys/netinet/ipfw2 ?
>
> Also, I can't help noticing that sys/netinet/ contains 36 files
> related to sctp -- wouldn't it be the case to move them
> (perhaps with the exception of the userland headers)
> to a separate subdirectory ?
>
> (I know the same reasoning would apply to tcp, which has 23 files,
> but the issue here is that there is 25 years of userland code expecting
> the tcp headers in netinet/ and moving them would be a
> nightmare for ports...)
>   
I think sctp belongs in it's own directory.

I'd vote for just ipfw; the "2" was an artifact of previous code.

    Sam




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49AAC849.9060105>