From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 12:47:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF4616A4CF for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:47:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3.dslextreme.com (mail3.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D653343F75 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:47:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jos@catnook.com) Received: (qmail 6140 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2003 20:47:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO w250.z064001178.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net) (66.218.45.239) by 192.168.8.73 with SMTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:47:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 99318 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Nov 2003 20:47:57 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:47:35 -0800 From: Jos Backus To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031115204757.GA98569@lizzy.catnook.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20031115164720.I13393@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> <20031115071458.GA29973@lizzy.catnook.com> <20031115171702.F13393@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031115171702.F13393@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: dc still reporting collisions X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jos@catnook.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:47:40 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:23:08PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > Jos Backus wrote: > > > Fwiw, I'm seeing the same with tx(4): > > Looks like a different problem. Probably. I was commenting on the (relatively) high collision count I'm seeing. This is a hub (DSL router) with 2 PC's on it. I have never seen this many collisions happening before. Plus I can no longer transfer files from the Windows system to the FreeBSD system (even using FTP), something that worked flawlessly at least until October 17th. So something is broken. You think it could be hardware? Thanks, Jos > > lizzy:~% ifconfig tx0 > > tx0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255 > > inet 10.0.0.10 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 10.0.0.10 > > ether 00:e0:29:09:e4:1a > > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > > status: active > > lizzy:~% netstat -i > > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll > > tx0 1500 00:e0:29:09:e4:1a 154423 1 118093 0 253 > > tx0 1500 10/24 lizzy 159162 - 122841 - - > > tx0 1500 10.0.0.10/32 lizzy-proxy 28 - 28 - - > > lo0 16384 5347 0 5347 0 0 > > lo0 16384 your-net localhost 442 - 442 - - > > lizzy:~% > > The dc(4) driver currently has an almost 1:1 ratio of packets:collisions. > Your tx0 is quite low. > > Seishi Hiragushi reported this 1.5 months ago: > > Message-Id: <20030902071657.1e94e2b4.s-hrgsh@lapis.plala.or.jp> > > > -- > > :{ andyf@speednet.com.au > > Andy Farkas > System Administrator > Speednet Communications > http://www.speednet.com.au/ > > > > > !DSPAM:3fb5d46c649171139613270! > > -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ jos at catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ require 'std/disclaimer'