From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 18:33:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFA0106564A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward20.mail.yandex.net (forward20.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581A88FC14 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (smtp19.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.19]) by forward20.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id C77DB10436B3; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:33:22 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1321382002; bh=VUlW1QG9mCBQOi9bEQYpLS/1iM0k2f12mD5APXVYebA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sUqlTCKfPe7aCBqnSEe3OhuPwCLAzj2IrvIBT2T9YgOZwYc+GbV7+w5or1zmNBq33 Qr+WtXPB4Gqnta6CkzuriouAxRrycxgsaUuthQeXBYQMnDoXmOJXQbCMyLSbk5grGJ BLQTM0n+fzmVnrdrsYJRIRemQt7JK/zUz9WbQCro= Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A5A52BE0341; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:33:22 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1321382002; bh=VUlW1QG9mCBQOi9bEQYpLS/1iM0k2f12mD5APXVYebA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sUqlTCKfPe7aCBqnSEe3OhuPwCLAzj2IrvIBT2T9YgOZwYc+GbV7+w5or1zmNBq33 Qr+WtXPB4Gqnta6CkzuriouAxRrycxgsaUuthQeXBYQMnDoXmOJXQbCMyLSbk5grGJ BLQTM0n+fzmVnrdrsYJRIRemQt7JK/zUz9WbQCro= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id XM1idR3o-XM1KkC1p; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:33:22 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:33:21 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1858421324.20111115203321@yandex.ru> To: RW In-Reply-To: <20111114235054.7c1e96c3@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <1274456846.20111114215728@yandex.ru> <20111114205141.2bf80ae1@gumby.homeunix.com> <908814265.20111115000600@yandex.ru> <20111114235054.7c1e96c3@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: geli + journal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:33:24 -0000 Здравствуйте, RW. Вы писали 15 ноября 2011 г., 1:50:54: R> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:06:00 +0200 R> Коньков Евгений wrote: >>catch idea, but some question: >> in this situation .eli.journal journal device will not be encrypted? >> can you describe how data flow will be? R> The journal is encrypted unless you choose to put it on a separate R> non-encrypted device. R> In principle the data is encrypted into the journal, decrypted from R> the journal and then re-encrypted into its final location. In practice R> I've found that in file copying between disks, writing uses about R> twice as much cpu time as reading, so maybe the decryption from the R> journal can be avoided by caching. Are there differences between .eli.journal or .journal.eli? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru