From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 21:37:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C51B106564A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 21:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5B38FC0A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 21:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so186752pbb.13 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 14:37:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7/gNEXIFgUhpKP6FcTg9djJ0al4g6E3zOVYydVoxn9o=; b=DBE8AecqDAW36v07+4j+8hCqx0sR1kieLc9JJbydIYrTYcwJrKoNe6WqIlMa0k/oyS JNzMkl3Vx3jn1Gtu5ZQ5HPHCmb3mG27xId6puSM03ViwVYF8VmZcoULzCapidiiVnRwT DF320f47sleb5X2YiYmct6RgaYzYBidG8MVZh/KepOasdF2Dk5tF3YBLqYIHfSd+rMmN uHjc+dYCe26336O2witkQRB7xsPKHSu1rNiQs6pAi6t06awzB5YAbWbwrFn+YyZC1rNn fw8TLnz8sy/k5GgcZyzdqzvNjG5FuXAEa921kQAbNvofo1K+fmCEZY5tFliJQlIvgL+K 7XIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.116.17 with SMTP id js17mr5728051pbb.109.1344202648748; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 14:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.115.232 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:37:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:37:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kQuWtjuA0zIGZHYZ5kEKfSEwwmk Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Outback Dingo , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMALL FreeBSD capable board X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:37:29 -0000 On 5 August 2012 10:07, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > thanks for answer. > TP-Link TL-WR1043ND seems to be best choice for me. I'm not sure how much power the thing draws when operational. It'd be nice if someone started taking responsibility for power save support on the SoCs. I'm happy to eventually make the wifi side of things power-save enabled, but I can't also do the ARM/MIPS SoCs. :( Adrian