From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 20 20:36:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F6737B404; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74AC1A809; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:36:12 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714FC5422; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:36:12 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:36:12 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew To: cy@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/37290: New port: tool for setting the title of xterms In-Reply-To: <200204210301.g3L31Zd27349@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20020421133225.A30679-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 cy@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Why do we need this port? The following shell script can set XTerm Shall we rewrite all programs in the Bourne shell? There are a number that could be. I don't really mind if it gets commited or not but I thought it should be the end users choice as to what they install or if they wirte scripts to do what they need. If we are going to only have ports that a number deem useful we can certainly quickly save some disk space ;-) Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message