From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 2 23:43:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CA116A420 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 23:43:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9AC43D46 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 23:43:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-22-247.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.247]) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2006 18:43:07 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,161,1139202000"; d="scan'208"; a="210642384:sNHT59950400" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17415.33406.325997.256300@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:40:46 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44077D0A.9080406@daleco.biz> References: <004b01c63e47$86ecbde0$51ae2747@approved> <44077D0A.9080406@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta24) "dandelion" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: installation configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 23:43:10 -0000 Kevin Kinsey writes: > >Is there any way to install freebsd very easily > >just by popping in a cd rom and following prompts? > >I tried it and got nowhere fast. > > I would maintain that FreeBSD isn't terribly difficult > to install. But if by "prompts" you mean 6.49 "Yes/No" > type questions, the answer is, "of course not." It's > a tad more like Christmas Eve: put the kids to bed, > collect the tools, open the box, RTFM, and put it > together before dawn..... It is my understanding this is not technically true. If I had 100 identical machines, I would investigate the "make release" path and roll my own. I believe this gives you the ability to include a configuration file which auto-answers most if not all of the sysinsall questions. For a single machine, there is - or a least used to be - an "express" install option. I've never used it, so I have no idea how "express" it was. Robert Huff