From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu Feb 8 07:19:39 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92996F096C6; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 07:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4176E778C6; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 07:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 809C012F3; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 01:19:32 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 01:19:31 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Ganael LAPLANCHE , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r460940 - in head/games: afternoonstalker burgerspace cosmosmash Message-ID: <20180208071931.GA13039@lonesome.com> References: <201802041634.w14GYHVW017651@repo.freebsd.org> <20180208071352.GA63012@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180208071352.GA63012@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 07:19:39 -0000 On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 07:13:52AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 04:34:17PM +0000, Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: > > New Revision: 460940 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/460940 > > > > Log: > > Fix build with Clang 6 (C++14 by default) > > ... by forcing gnu++98 without giving the details of the breakages and > why they were not properly fixed instead. :-) For once I'm going to agree with danfe (someone take a picture!) but only to the extent that I would like to ask that the commit messages be "work around the build" rather than "fix". There have been numerous commits that did contain actual code fixes. Despite the quibble, I appreciate the effort people are putting into the clang 6 problems -- these have especially regressed our tier-2 package builds. mcl