From owner-freebsd-net  Mon Aug 23 20:39: 7 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D12D14F33
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id MAA17181;
	Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:37:51 +0900 (JST)
To: snap-users@kame.net
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: ettikan's message of Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:32:28 JST.
      <C82567D7.000DF5AE.00@NTTMSCCJ02.nttmsc.com.my> 
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 1110) Problem with kame 3.1 
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:37:50 +0900
Message-ID: <17179.935465870@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>I'm using FreeBSD 3.2 with kame-19990517-fbsd31-release on my dell notebook. Had
> this problem
>when tried compiling kame.
>Any patch... or suggestions ???

	Why are you mixing versions? (KAME kit for FreeBSD31 on FreeBSD32)
	FreeBSD31 and 32 are very different and we are unable to help you.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message