From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Dec 31 20:36:18 2000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 31 20:36:16 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailhub.state.me.us (mailhub.state.me.us [141.114.122.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDB037B400 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 20:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from katahdin.bmv.state.me.us by mailhub.state.me.us with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:28:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (darren@localhost) by katahdin.bmv.state.me.us (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with ESMTP id XAA09752; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:36:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:36:14 -0500 (EST) From: Darren Henderson To: Christian Weisgerber Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nrsa0 v nsa0 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: darren@katahdin.bmv.state.me.us Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Darren Henderson wrote: > Yes I saw that. That doesn't mean they aren't treated differently though, > sa0=nsa0=esa0=nrsa0 etc etc etc, but the name used dictates the > functionality. oops. bad example perhaps. I was thinking of things like joe treating a hard link of jpico differently based on the name. ________________________________________________________________________ Darren Henderson darren@bmv.state.me.us darren.henderson@state.me.us To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message