From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 4 05:59:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AA71065703; Tue, 4 May 2010 05:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DC88FC0C; Tue, 4 May 2010 05:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.170.20.44] (nat-170-142-177-44.tn.gov [170.142.177.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o445xkgL079578 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 May 2010 01:59:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4BDFB7BF.9080600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 00:59:27 -0500 From: Robert Noland Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090218) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy References: <20100430183522.GD64008@bsdcrew.de> <20100503061344.GA98887@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4BDEE40F.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <20100503215027.GA52686@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20100503215027.GA52686@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org, Martin Wilke Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Xorg 7.5 merge comming tomorrow. X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 05:59:51 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-May-03 09:56:15 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: >>> To re-iterate, on a RV380 with dual screens laid out side-by-side, >>> moving a window into the RH screen causes corruption of both screens. >>> The RH screen updating is also far slower then the LH screen (which >>> seems fairly normal). >> Is all of this configured using randr? With randr, both displays are a >> single framebuffer, so from a performance perspective, there is no >> difference in the displays. The other part of your issue sounds like >> possibly an exceeded texture limit, or mismapping somehow. > > No, all configuration uses xorg.conf (see attached). I agree that > the performance difference doesn't make sense but if I start a > default startx (which gives me 3 xterms and twm) then moving the > windows around the LH screen appears normal. When I move a window > onto the RH screen, updates are very noticably laggy and leave > shadows. I have an identical system running Xorg 7.4 on FreeBSD 7.2 > which behaves normally so this is a regression in Xorg 7.5. Hrm, do bad things happen before a pixel crosses vertical 2048? It looks like you have 2 1280x1024 displays and a virtual framebuffer 2560 pixels wide. I'm wondering if the issue occurs as soon as the window starts onto the second display, or if it has to go past 2048 before the problem appears. robert. >> You are using EXA, right? > > Yes. I tried XAA on the off-chance that it would do something differnt > but it behaved the same. > >