From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jul 15  9:40:15 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F39B155BA; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01989;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	kip@lyris.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq 
In-reply-to: Your message of "15 Jul 1999 12:22:12 +0200."
             <kq3dyqfc17.fsf@zabagek.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> 
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:36:54 -0700
Message-ID: <1985.932056614@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Jordan should have to say something about this. AFAIR, bumps are
> allowed but only by one between releases. We will have to provide
> libc_r.so.3 in /usr/lib/compat/compat3x, though (we'll have to do this 
> anyway by the time 4.x is released).

I'd prefer not to bump it...  John Birrell and I are already not
entirely in agreement that the change required a version bump at
all.  It didn't change any interfaces.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message