Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:43:54 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it>
To:        noor@comrax.com
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: divert + keep-state
Message-ID:  <200007241443.QAA74794@info.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10007230120470.94646-100000@dns.comrax.com> from "noor@comrax.com" at "Jul 23, 2000 01:24:48 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
you should only use 'keep-state' with "setup" TCP packets, and
with UDP. Yes you can have a bit more security but setting up
the firewall is a bit trickier.

	cheers
	luigi

> Hi all,
> 
> I have a FreeBSD box with two NIC's that I use to link our internal
> network to the outside network. I use ipfw+natd to do this. The following
> is the divert rule:
> 
> add divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl1
> 
> xl1 is the outer NIC. My question is: can I do the following:
> 
> add check-state
> add divert 8668 ip from any to any via xl1 keep-state
> 
> I am trying to keep-state for diverted packets. Is this a better secured
> way to divert packets (if it works really), or the first should do it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Noor
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007241443.QAA74794>