From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 22 12:27:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C12A106564A for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (m209-73.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.209.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA42C8FC13 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3MCRVVS041144; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 05:27:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3MCRVKK041143; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 05:27:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 05:27:31 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Message-ID: <20110422122731.GF1553@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20110422114116.GZ1553@albert.catwhisker.org> <20110422122006.GA1682@elch.exwg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BVXm2WAry1WzRMtx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110422122006.GA1682@elch.exwg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Errors during Upgrade netpbm-10.26.64_4 to netpbm-10.35.80_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:27:37 -0000 --BVXm2WAry1WzRMtx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 02:20:07PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ... > Does your transcript miss stderr? Not as such -- it was captured via script(1); I merely excerpted what I thought were relevant or representative parts: the whole thing was around 120KB (1772 lines), which seemed to have too low a signal-to-noise ratio for my tastes. :-} > THe current graphics/netpbm port does not compile if there's an older > version of netpbm installed That would seem to indicate that upgradiing (per se) is not possible, and that a /usr/ports/UPDATING entry might be warranted, IMO. > - /usr/local/include/pm.h from the older > netpbm takes precedence over the port's lib/pm.h but misses some macros > (well, it's an upgrade...) as PM_GNU_PRINTF_ATTR(a, b) which then confuse > the compiler. > pkg_delete -f the old netpbm and re-install the port, worked for me. Cool; I'll try that shortly: thanks! Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --BVXm2WAry1WzRMtx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk2xdDIACgkQmprOCmdXAD3hXACdF1RNGcvKNSB1XPyuJR4qWQTT dAMAnidR10jx3y7rYpGryQds+VgPU4px =59el -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BVXm2WAry1WzRMtx--