From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May 11 10:23:37 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from cygnus.rush.net (cygnus.rush.net [209.45.245.133])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAA015088
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 11 May 1999 10:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@rush.net)
Received: from localhost (bright@localhost)
	by cygnus.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA07565;
	Tue, 11 May 1999 12:45:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 12:45:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>
To: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no>
Cc: Lyndon.Nerenberg@MessagingDirect.COM, cyouse@cybersites.com,
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Sockets and SYSTEM V message queue
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905110909390.8446-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990511124519.24802c-100000@cygnus.rush.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 11 May 1999, Marius Bendiksen wrote:

> 
> I'm not sure what kind of improvement you would get by using AF_LOCAL,
> but I've seen well in excess of 40 mbyte/sec throughput on a 66Mhz 486dx2,
> using the loopback interface. I believe you would need RAID to actually
> feed sensible data into the interface at this speed (assuming the disk is
> the source of this data).

It's not :)

-Alfred




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message