From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jul 8 09:28:13 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA28221 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 09:28:13 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id JAA28188 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 09:28:07 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP (5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA13484; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 18:28:03 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id SAA26322; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 18:28:02 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA21479; Sat, 8 Jul 1995 16:42:06 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199507081442.QAA21479@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: kern/600: PPP does not pay attention to IPTOS_LOWDELAY To: hsu@clinet.fi Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 16:42:04 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199507080000.RAA29882@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Heikki Suonsivu" at Jul 7, 95 05:00:02 pm Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 764 Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Heikki Suonsivu wrote: > > if (INTERACTIVE(p & 0xffff) || INTERACTIVE(p >> 16)) > ifq = &sc->sc_fastq; > } > + > + /* > + * Most high-priority services set IPTOS_LOWDELAY. This is a much more > + * generic mechanism than specific port numbers. This same mechanism > + * is used by slip. > + */ > + if (ip->ip_tos & IPTOS_LOWDELAY) > + ifq = &sc->sc_fastq; > + About to commit it. Btw., the ``interactive'' hack has been removed from if_sl.c in 4.4BSD. Is this a good or a bad thing? Who's actually setting IPTOS_LOWDELAY? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)