From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 11:29:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15AD37B401 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from secnap2.secnap.com (corp.secnap.net [208.237.120.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BA543FDF for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:29:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Scheidell@secnap.com) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 14:29:28 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Status of SPARC64 port? Thread-Index: AcL9/CVhRasNP9ujRLyoCTZSJc6rJgAAEn4Q From: To: cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Status of SPARC64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 18:29:30 -0000 Thank you, I did try to read those but they conflict each other (which = is wat I stated in first email) (both of these links are under the release notes.. on says v100 is = supported, one says its not) as in its NOT supported: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/relnotes-sparc64.html#AEN401 or as in it IS supported? http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/sparc.html#hw