Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:33:24 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: dgilbert@dclg.ca Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame Message-ID: <22741.1073889204@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:35:28 %2B0100." <xzphdz2qicf.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzphdz2qicf.fsf@dwp.des.no>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: >> Maybe this would be a good test-case for seeing how well it works? >> Maybe not. We do need to run a few more test-cases for things through >> this scenario... I'm not sure this one is well suited to it. > >If we toss out Vinum, there's a significant risk that 5.3 will ship >without RAID support at all. I'm pretty certain we don't want that. If we don't do something drastic, there's a significant risk that 5.3 and all future releases will ship with partially broken RAID support. I'm pretty certain we don't want that either. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22741.1073889204>