From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 6 19:50:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397CC16A41F for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:50:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F70D43D45 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:50:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k06JoAWM015964 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:50:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k06JoAOS015963; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:50:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:50:10 GMT Message-Id: <200601061950.k06JoAOS015963@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Josh Paetzel Cc: Subject: ports/91368 xephem patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Josh Paetzel List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:50:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/91368; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Josh Paetzel To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, frank@dynamical-systems.org, edwin@mavetju.org Cc: Subject: ports/91368 xephem patch Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:47:17 -0600 However, regardless of the validity of this patch, I ask that you not include it in the freebsd ports version of XEphem. That seems to be pretty clear to me. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel