From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 10:37:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F98216A407 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tofig@freebsd.az) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40DC13C441 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tofig@freebsd.az) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so6775306nfc for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.41.3 with SMTP id t3mr4215968nfj.1167732533232; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:08:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.3? ( [81.21.81.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z73sm84310689nfb.2007.01.02.02.08.48; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:08:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <459A2F2C.3090706@oxygen.az> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:08:44 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tofik Suleymanov Cc: tofik@oxygen.az Subject: vmstat -i weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:37:19 -0000 Hello list, looks like `vmstat -i` acts weird on my machine after being 12-15 hours uptime.Here is the iutput of `vmstat -i`: > vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 6813 0 irq9: acpi0 5397 0 irq12: psm0 73782 1 irq14: ata0 74209 1 irq15: ata1 47 0 irq18: uhci2 1 0 irq19: uhci3 ehci0 1 0 irq21: iwi0 35139 0 cpu0: timer 105315537 1999 Total 105510926 2003 > Strange is that for example atkbd0 has rate of 0, but total interrupts count of atkbd0 is growing. Machine runs FreeBSD 6.1 RELEASE p11 with pretty common kernel. Is this known behaviour ? many thanks, Tofig Suleymanov.