From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 22:41:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87981065670 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4B08FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:41:42 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAEAEyZPlCDaFvO/2dsb2JhbABFhgO1doIgAQEBAwEBAQEgKyAEBwUWDgoCAg0ZAikBCSYGCAcEAQgUBIdmBguocJMpgSGJZxqFLYESA5MrgiuBFI8Bgn+BRQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,336,1344225600"; d="scan'208";a="177074082" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-jnhn-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2012 18:41:34 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1528B3FE3; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:41:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: Bob Friesenhahn Message-ID: <1825065717.1296363.1346280093679.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.202] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:41:43 -0000 Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Tim Gustafson wrote: > > > > Not having autofs on FreeBSD is a real thorn in my side. I'm trying > > to get FreeBSD implemented more at UCSC, and specifically the School > > of Engineering, as a large-volume file server, and the lack of a > > proper auto-mounter that works the same way (or at least close > > enough) > > as all our other systems is a huge roadblock. > > I agree. I don't understand the relationship between FreeBSD and AMD > (am-utils). FreeBSD barely admits to having AMD and does not provide > any documentation for it. Likewise, books about FreeBSD do not > discuss the automounter. > Among other things, I think amd is the last thing to use the old mount(2) syscall instead of nmount(2) for NFS mounts. I haven't had the nerve to even look at the code. > > I'm not much of a kernel hacker, otherwise I might attempt this > > myself, but it seems like this can't possibly be that hard, > > especially > > since it's implemented in Linux, which is GPL'd and therefore open > > to > > porting. > > It would be more reasonable to re-use the Sun automounter code from > Illumos which should be under CDDL license like zfs. The Sun > automounter code is more mature than Linux automounter and has fewer > missing features and fewer bugs. > I had actually thought that the Mac OS X autofs was based on the Solaris one, but I could be incorrect? I think I've also mentioned that an autofs port would be nice. I suspect the reason it hasn't happened is simply "no one with the time/resources and skills has volunteered to do it"? (I am not familiar with Alfred's port and there may be others I am not familiar with. I am also not familiar with any patent issues that might exist. Talk of patents does make me nervous, but I would hope that the CDDL'd code would be ok to include as a loadable module.) rick > Bob > -- > Bob Friesenhahn > bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, > http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ > GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"