From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 12:22:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7FFB5B for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B517C5 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435C9F4DA1E for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 04:21:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 05:21:26 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Ellis To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1420201286256-5977676.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: ARM build machine question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:22:45 -0000 I'm setting up a new amd64 machine that I'll be using for one purpose only, building ARM images based on CURRENT. What's the recommendation, should I be running 10.1 or CURRENT on the build machine? No display on the build machine. SSH access only. I know probably either works, but just wondering if there was a preference from some more experienced developers out there. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/ARM-build-machine-question-tp5977676.html Sent from the freebsd-arm mailing list archive at Nabble.com.