Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:35:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> Cc: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>, # rm -rf /* <geniusj@shell.phrozen.org>, Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DoS?? Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990624183450.15020I-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9906241738080.1214-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Tom wrote: > Using sshd from inetd is just a bad idea. sshd as a daemon is much > better, because the key is generated every hour. I belive sshd as a > daemon has a max connections settings that you should definitely use. Another great reason not to use sshd from inetd: If you break inetd, sshd still works. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.HPP.3.96.990624183450.15020I-100000>