From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 23 01:45:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EC316A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 01:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyer.circlesquared.com
	(host217-45-219-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.83])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634B543D2F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 01:45:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com)
Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.petanna.net [127.0.0.1])
	i0N9nYBn086233
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:49:45 GMT
	(envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com)
Message-ID: <4010EE2E.3050200@circlesquared.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:49:34 +0000
From: Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20031102
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <4010DF2B.1070804@ant.uni-bremen.de>
	<20040123091337.GA46755@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20040123091337.GA46755@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: How dangerous is 5.2 for production use
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:45:39 -0000

Matthew Seaman wrote:

> Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems
>
>you have than UFS1.  I also have a vague feeling that background fsck
>is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation to either confirm or
>deny that.
>
>  
>
I'm sure this is right. If one of my 5.* machines has an un-clean 
shutdown it states that it is starting background fsck checks as it 
completes its boot process.

PWR.