Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:49:34 +0000 From: Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How dangerous is 5.2 for production use Message-ID: <4010EE2E.3050200@circlesquared.com> In-Reply-To: <20040123091337.GA46755@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4010DF2B.1070804@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20040123091337.GA46755@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman wrote: > Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems > >you have than UFS1. I also have a vague feeling that background fsck >is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation to either confirm or >deny that. > > > I'm sure this is right. If one of my 5.* machines has an un-clean shutdown it states that it is starting background fsck checks as it completes its boot process. PWR.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4010EE2E.3050200>